In Doctrines, Freedom, Myth Industry, Pluralism, Theory of Value

This post continues the exchange between myself and Gary Mongiovi in the pages of Research in Political Economy, which started with my article entitled [‘Crisis and “law of motion” in economics: a critique of positivist Marxism’] (2010c) in RiPE issue 26. This post constitutes my response to Mongiovi’s critique.

It should be cited as “Alan Freeman (2011), Crisis, Marxism, and Economic Laws: A Response to Gary Mongiovi, in Paul Zarembka, Radhika Desai (ed.) Revitalizing Marxist Theory for Today’s Capitalism (Research in Political Economy, Volume 27), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.285-296″.

It responds to Gary Mongiovi’s article in the same issue (Mongiovi 2011) which, in turn, responded to my article ‘Crisis and “law of motion” in economics: a critique of positivist Marxism’ (Freeman 2010c) in RiPE issue 26, a pre-publication version of which can be found on REPEC at http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/48619.html.

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?
Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [102.99 KB]

Leave a Comment

Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt

Start typing and press Enter to search